Disaster Awareness and Preparedness Behaviors: Evidence from a Case Study in Adana, Turkey

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118695

Keywords:

Disaster awareness, preparedness behaviors, earthquake, Adana, disaster management, community-based preparedness, international comparison

Abstract

Disasters not only cause physical destruction but also deeply affect the social, economic, and psychological structures of societies. Due to its geological characteristics, Turkey is highly vulnerable to many types of disasters, particularly earthquakes. This study examines disaster awareness and preparedness behaviors in the province of Adana. Based on a field survey conducted with 560 participants, individuals’ disaster experiences, preparedness levels, family communication strategies, emergency kit ownership, and levels of trust in institutions were measured.

Findings show that 74% of the participants have been directly or indirectly affected by a disaster. However, despite this high rate of experience, only 29.1% reported having an emergency kit, indicating a low level of societal preparedness. Moreover, the proportion of households with an evacuation plan was found to be only 38%, while participation in volunteerism and community solidarity remained below international standards. These results reveal a significant gap between disaster awareness and preparedness behaviors.

International comparisons demonstrate that in countries advanced in disaster preparedness, such as Japan and the United States, individual preparedness levels are much higher. For example, the proportion of people with an emergency kit is over 90% in Japan and around 60% in the United States. The case of Adana reflects Turkey’s overall disaster preparedness profile and points to strategic deficiencies at the national level. In this context, it is concluded that local governments, non-governmental organizations, and central authorities must work in coordination.

 

References

Cabinet Office of Japan. (2021). Disaster Management in Japan. Tokyo: Government of Japan.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2020). Preparedness in America: Research Insights to Increase Individual, Organizational, and Community Action. Washington, DC.

Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616-632.

Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5-34.

Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y., & Shiwaku, K. (2012). Disaster Education. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management, Vol. 9. Emerald Group Publishing.

Shiwaku, K., & Shaw, R. (2016). Disaster risk reduction and education: Case studies from Japan. Springer.

UNDRR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

UNDRR. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations.

Published

2025-09-16

How to Cite

ÖZBAY, O. (2025). Disaster Awareness and Preparedness Behaviors: Evidence from a Case Study in Adana, Turkey. SSD Journal, 10(52), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118695

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.